Reputation Management

Review collection

TL;DR

Aelara asks for a Google review at the point each treatment's result is actually visible — not a single fixed delay for every patient. Every patient gets the same message with a Google review option and a private feedback option side by side. The private channel isn't a filter — it's an early-warning system so problems get caught and handled directly, before they reach a public review.

Book a 20-min walkthrough →

The problem

Reviews drive bookings more than almost anything else in aesthetics — most new patients pick a clinic off Google reviews before they ever speak to anyone. But asking for a review well-timed enough to matter, for every patient, on every treatment, isn't something most clinics have the admin capacity to run consistently. It either doesn't happen, or happens on the same generic schedule for everyone regardless of what they actually had done.

Timing that actually matches the treatment

A review asked for too early is worse than no review at all — the patient hasn't seen the result yet, so the review undersells what you actually do. Two examples:

Botox — most patients don't see the full result until 10–14 days out. Ask any earlier and you're asking someone to review a treatment that hasn't finished working yet.

Dermal fillers — a few days, once the initial swelling's settled and the patient can actually see the shape they're left with.

This runs off the same timing engine as Aelara's treatment follow-up system — one model of "when is this patient actually ready," reused for both rebooking prompts and review requests.

Every patient, same message

Aelara doesn't filter who gets asked for a public review based on how their check-in went — that's a practice called "review gating," and it's explicitly against Google's policy. Every patient gets the same message, every time.

What that message contains: a Google review link and a private feedback option, side by side. The private channel isn't a route around the review — it's an early-warning system. If a patient flags something, your team hears about it first and can reach out directly to resolve it. A patient whose concern gets handled quickly often comes back and leaves a positive review, or updates a negative one they'd already started writing.

Catching a problem early and asking for honest reviews from everyone aren't in conflict. They just have to run as two separate things — not one funnel that decides who reaches Google.

How it works in practice

Same patient record Aelara already tracks treatment dates on. Once a treatment's result window has passed, every patient gets the same message by SMS or WhatsApp — a Google review link and a private feedback option. If a patient chooses private feedback, your team is flagged immediately. You reach out, resolve it, and the patient decides what to do with their review from there.

What it isn't

This isn't a blast with no mechanism for catching problems first — that's how clinics end up with negative reviews they could have handled privately. It's not asking before the result is even visible. And it's not a replacement for the relationship — patients are happy because of the treatment, not because of a text message. Aelara just makes sure the ask happens at the right moment, with a private channel running alongside it so nothing goes straight to Google unaddressed.

Book a 20-min walkthrough →

Back to Aelara